Methodology, dissemination and popularization of scientific research. Strategic guide to produce and communicate knowledge
Keywords:
Scientific research; methodology; data analysis; research design; research dissemination; science communication.Synopsis
Scientific research constitutes a fundamental basis for the advancement of knowledge; however, its quality and replicability depend critically on the use of rigorous and accessible methodologies. A lack of comprehensive understanding of research processes—from design to dissemination—limits the social impact of findings and perpetuates gaps between theory and practice. This text aims to provide a structured and practical guide for conducting scientific research, integrating quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches, with an emphasis on education, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences, formal sciences, and engineering and technology. Through a sequential analysis—problem formulation, literature review, data collection and analysis, interpretation of results, and communication—an adaptable methodological framework is developed, illustrated with case studies and visual tools such as diagrams, tables, and workflows. The findings highlight the importance of methodological triangulation for validating results, ethical data management, and the articulation between acade
mic dissemination and public outreach. The central conclusion emphasizes that research excellence is not based solely on technical precision, but on the capacity to generate actionable, ethical, and contextualized knowledge that addresses global needs and fosters an inclusive scientific culture. This comprehensive approach positions methodology as a bridge between intellectual curiosity and social transformation, essential for training critical researchers and addressing complex challenges in the twenty-first century.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Iannizzi, C., Piechotta, V., Kahale, L. A., Barker, J. M., McKenzie, J. E., Page, M. J., Skoetz, N., & PRISMA-LSR Group. (2024). Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): Checklist and explanation. BMJ, 387. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-079183
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Alley, M. (2013). The craft of scientific presentations. Springer.
Bauer, M. W., & Jensen, P. (2011). The Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge.
Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-73
Bonney, R., et al. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage Publications.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806290531
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Science communication research: Themes and challenges. Journal of Science Communication, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13030301
Bunge, M. (2012). La ciencia, su método y su filosofía. Ediciones Siglo XXI.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2011). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge University Press.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley.
Eco, U. (2015). Cómo se hace una tesis. Debolsillo.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 42(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/288723
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Gastel, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge University Press.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. (Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele University and Durham University.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 8(4), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317800800402
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature review: Six steps to success. Corwin.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.
Medina-Romero, M. Á. (2023). Las herramientas de inteligencia artificial orientadas al fortalecimiento del desarrollo de investigaciones científicas y académicas: El caso de Smartpaper. AI en América Latina. Ciencia Latina. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 7542–7553. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6743
Medina-Romero, M. Á., Hurtado Tiza, D. R., Muñoz Murillo, J. P., Ochoa Cervantez, D. O., & Izundegui Ordóñez, G. (2023a). Método mixto de investigación: Cuantitativo y cualitativo. Instituto Universitario de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología IMUDI Perú. https://doi.org/10.35622/inudi.b.105
Medina-Romero, M. Á., Santana Ortiz, R., Jaramillo Saavedra, E. A., Huaman Ccanto, F., Martel Carranza, C. P., & Cáceres Huambo, A. (2023b). Estrategias para desarrollar una tesis. Instituto Universitario de Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología IMUDI Perú.
Medrano, J. D., & Medrano, J. (2021). Comunicación pública de la ciencia. Editorial UOC.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Montgomery, S. L. (2003). The Chicago guide to communicating science. University of Chicago Press.
Morse, J. M. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. Qualitative Health Research, 20(4), 483-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310364626
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 15(12), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/q1yk-4387
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L., & Keena, V. (2002). Scientific writing: Easy when you know how. BMJ Books.
Popper, K. (2002). La lógica de la investigación científica. Tecnos.
Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. Wiley.
Rojas Soriano, R. (2018). Guía para realizar investigaciones sociales. Plaza y Valdés
Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
Sagan, C. (1997). El mundo y sus demonios: La ciencia como una luz en la oscuridad. Planeta.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(4), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180411
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334-340.
Swetnam, D., & Swetnam, R. (2009). Writing your dissertation: The bestselling guide to planning, preparing and presenting first-class work. How To Books.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Special Libraries Association.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Turabian, K. L. (2018). A manual for writers of research papers, theses, and dissertations. University of Chicago Press.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Published
July 21, 2025
Series
Copyright (c) 2025 Miguel Ángel Medina Romero, Raúl Alberto Rodríguez Alvarado
Details about the available publication format: PDF
PDF
ISBN-13 (15)
978-9942-561-49-7
Publication date (01)
2025-07-21
